Learn more. You may notice that the 'cookie consent' form pops up more often than usual lately - we are tweaking it behind-the-scenes to make sure it's working comprehensively. If you see it again it's because something has changed so please set your preferences accordingly. Page 1 of 4. The only things that I like in PT are editing and the mixer view.
I can't go for Logic, cause I don't have a mac My Studio. They all seem to get new features more often than changes to workflow. If you like PT's editing and mixer view, you probably wouldn't like changing.
It seems easier to compensate for missing features than to deal with a workflow you don't like. OTOH, you may prefer the new workflow, but that's a gamble. I like my Cubase 5 right now, but I'm thinking of Pro Tools too. Sampie all the way I first jumped on Samplitude at version 5. I was using a ProTools Mix system at work and had Logic home.
Logic for Windows was giving me fits. I never use Autotune, it's right on the object it's also the predecessor to PT's Elastic Time -a fantastic plugin suite -direct CD burning form the project. Also you can archive to DVD from the project.
The big deal for me is that everything I need is contained in the DAW. If not, either one would be good. Download Samps demo. I like Samplitude and for audio it is a great program with some very good plugins. I also prefer it's GUI and workflow. Most of those features in Samplitude are available in Cubase, and there are some features in Cubase not in Samplitude, such as Variaudio. You could also consider Sonar PE. Version 9 is coming out soon and this is also a very powerful program.
Samplitude and Sonar have demos, so you could try them out, Cubase 5 has no demo, but there are lots of youtube videos showcasing it's workflow and power on a range of audio and MIDI tasks. Sonar 8. I read that from Cakewalk employees on their forum.
It looks really good. In some ways, Sonar has a more similar track view and mix view to Pro Tools. No dongle. Matrix view like in Ableton Live. Nice people. Good synths and plug-ins included. Cubase 5: I love Variaudio -- built in pitch correction. Great for MIDI. VSTs work well in it. My choice of audio interface. Logic just integrates so well with Mac. Cubase 5 actually performs well on a Mac some earlier versions less so though.
Just a personal choice. I like the choice of in line editing, or floating window editing Cubase provides these options. Both companies could use some improvement on the customer service and support front mind. I use logic 8 with a macbook pro I have Logic 9 ,cubase 5 ,PT le 8 mbox 2 pro all running on mac ,with apogee symphony,I ordered PC i7 ,so my plan is to run logic on mac ,cubase on PC.
I do a lot of concert recording, medium sized bands, pop vocalists, midi sequencing, TV jingles, post productions, Electronic music, mixing records with plugins, Playing different instruments in multi-microphone setup,etc. I am versatile musician and I find Cubase the most intuitive even though I've learned to deal with it's bugs and glitches.
It does the job completely! Even on an old G It doesn't perform as I expect it to, but I still prefer it over logic. By now, audio editing in logic should be like using freaking iPhone You will also need a pair of glasses for it seriously. For me is Cubase and it always will be. If Steinberg goes out of business on mac, I have no other alternative but to find another route. And it's definitely going to be non Logic9 route. And yes, with maximum buffers I still max out the i7 on every single mix.
I personally think you just have to get stuff and try it out for yourself. Isn't there a demo for Cubase 5? Once you actually learn Logic it's great. You can't beat all it's components in terms of value.
Even if you end up getting Cubase too I think that for electronic music which isn't my main thing , Logic totally excels at. The way you can just make arrangements very quickly, loop regions, quantize regions non destructively seems perfect for that genre. The only thing I really miss, that I use all the time in DP, is the melodyne like pitch correction ability which cubase has.
Happy hunting. After reading a book about Logic 9 and a book about Cubase 5 I've decided on Logic. Thanks everybody! Sounds like the OP has made his decision, but regardless, I'll chime in. I'm a very happy Logic user who switched over from Pro Tools several years ago. I've also done a bit of work in Cubase at a good friend's studio, but I don't own it.
I do mostly rock and folk music, with the occasional electronica or classical or jazz project. Logic has been great on every one of those styles for me. Those are the things everyone tends to say. But I also want to say that the audio editing is really, really good, which is probably more important for me. Spending most of my time in a rock or folk vein has worked great in Logic.
The audio editing is all I need it to be. The only audio editing feature I like better in Cubase is the "volume handle" on each individual audio region, which makes it easy to do a quick volume change. The Logic handling of a feature like this is simple, too, but it's just a two step process double click on the audio region, which automatically brings up the waveform or sample editor, then change the volume from a menu there instead of a one-step process. But that's really it, and I rarely need to do something like that, anyway.
The audio editing is great for me in Logic. It'll take you a little while to make the transition from Pro Tools to either Logic or Cubase anyway, and since you're going with a Mac, I really do believe that Logic is the way to go. The other apps in the bundle are great, too. Soundtrack Pro is really nice, as is WaveBurner. I don't use Mainstage personally, but I have friends who do, and they love it, as well. When it comes to GUI layout and overall design, there is a certain amount of individual taste that comes into play.
Login to Your Account. Remember Me? What's New? Results 1 to 4 of 4. Cubase 5 Vs Pro Tools Le which do you guys prefer.. Originally Posted by Itz Stylesz. Re: Cubase 5 Vs Pro Tools Le if you got the cash and you're serious about makin music professionally, then pro tolls is pretty much the industry standard. It'll save you time learning a new program anyway. I thought I'd chime in with some further information on the Pro Tools system.
0コメント